Казино бесплатно онлайн и без регистрации игровые автоматы вулкан
This little thought experiment is plausible, but not ideal as an illustration бесплатный заработок денег на игры it is easily conflated with vague notions we might entertain about fusion of agency in the ideal of marriage-and it is important to distinguish the dynamics of preference conditionalization in teams of distinct agents from the simple collapse of individual agency.
So let us construct a better example. Imagine a corporate Chairperson consulting her risk-averse Board about whether they should pursue a dangerous hostile takeover bid.
Compare two possible procedures she might use: in process (i) she sends each Board member an individual e-mail about the idea a week prior to the meeting; in process (ii) she springs it on them collectively at казино бесплатно онлайн и без регистрации игровые автоматы вулкан meeting. In both imagined processes there are, at the point of voting, sets of individual preferences стратегия заработка покер be aggregated by the vote.
But it is more likely that some preferences in the set generated by the second process were conditional on preferences of others. A conditional preference as Stirling defines it is a preference that is influenced by information about the preferences of (specified) others.
This refers to the extent of controversy or discord to which a казино бесплатно онлайн и без регистрации игровые автоматы вулкан of preferences, including a set of conditional preferences, would generate if equilibrium among them were implemented. Members or leaders of teams do not always want to maximize concordance by engineering all internal games as Assurance or Hi-lo (though they will always likely want to eliminate PDs). For example, a manager might want to encourage a degree of competition among profit centers in a firm, while wanting the cost centers to identify completely with the team as a whole.
These may be applied recursively, i.
But, as noted earlier, we need to keep conditional preference distinct from agent fusion, and this condition helps to do that. More importantly, as a matter of mathematics it allows teams to be represented in directed graphs. The condition is not as restrictive, where modeling flexibility is concerned, as one might at first think, for two reasons. First, it only bars us from representing an agent j influenced by another agent i from directly influencing i.]